For what it’s worth,…
- in reply to Individualist and state-hater against illegals?, at Dry Hyphen Olympics
For what it’s worth, I’ve written before about Kinsella’s taxpayer-ownership argument and the claims about ownership of roads in comments at No Treason.
I think the funniest thing about the whole thing is the spectacle of a mad dog defender of Thomas DiLorenzo and Hans Hermann Hoppe coming out for centralist nationalism and majoritarian popular sovereignty in determining ownership claims over government property.
