For what it’s worth,…

For what it’s worth, I’ve written before about Kinsella’s taxpayer-ownership argument and the claims about ownership of roads in comments at No Treason.

I think the funniest thing about the whole thing is the spectacle of a mad dog defender of Thomas DiLorenzo and Hans Hermann Hoppe coming out for centralist nationalism and majoritarian popular sovereignty in determining ownership claims over government property.

Advertisement

Help me get rid of these Google ads with a gift of $10.00 towards this month’s operating expenses for radgeek.com. See Donate for details.