Re: ‘anarchists’ for big gov’t??
... If you admittedly don't know what you're talking about and don't care to find out anything about it, why are you still talking about it? For reference,
Re: Cutting off the tip of prejudicial points of entry
... I don't know about the background elsewhere in Europe, but in Britain and the U.K., the reasons why it first came to be commonly recommended by the medical
Re: Evolution
... Rand apparently also expressed something of a studied agnosticism on the topic of human evolution (cf.
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration, civil liberties, police etc
... Incidentally, 20 years ago, did you favor police beating up Rodney King? I ask because people label themselves all kinds of things, but I'm more interested
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration, civil liberties, police etc
... Well, O.K., but *Rockwell* wasn't a Republican 20 years ago; he was claiming to be a radical libertarian. In fact, he was claiming that this sort of vile
Re: compromises with anarchy
... Oh, come on Josh. "Bring them"? And if they decide that they don't want to be "brought"? There is no way to forcibly exile people from their homes without
Re: compromises with anarchy
... Right. So why do you suppose that it is that it's so much rarer to see soi-disant libertarians disagreeing about locking innocent drug users in cages for a
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration (corrected link)
... Sure; I'm open to good-faith meta-disagreement about that. Although it would help somewhat if I knew more about your reasons for thinking so. (For what
Re: Cutting off the tip of prejudicial points of entry
... (Or the decision can simply be rejected in childhood and adulthood -- as some intersex folks do, when not coerced; gender isn't a team sport, after all,
Re: compromises with anarchy
... No doubt people take many things to be obvious that are not as obvious as they think. But when an innocent individual person, who has committed no moral
Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2026 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.