By: Charles Johnson
I think you should re-read the paragraph you just quoted from Sheldon’s article. It’s specifically an endorsement and a defense of the deliberate use of trespass as a tactic for anti-racist social activism. Not a rejection of it.
The claim that Sheldon is “talking about how it would not have been appropriate†when the first sentence in the quoted passage directly and specifically refers to “my inclusion of sit-ins in the list of appropriate nonviolent forms of protest,†seems like a pretty bizarre misreading.
Anticopyright.