Comments Elsewhere

http://ift.tt/1ITpn9K

Good.

Good.

http://ift.tt/1fkjgDT Curse tablets.

http://ift.tt/1fkjgDT Curse tablets.

It’s good to know that now that I’m more actively blogging once again at http://radgeek.com/ , the comment-form spammers are eager to come back and post new comment-form spam on all my writing. I wasn’t sure I remembered where I could get some custom stamps usps,approved stamp psd,stampin up paper pumpkin,amazon stamps usps,rubber stamp gift bags,trodat printy 4912 typo,stamp act protests,ebay stamp collections for sale,trodat stamp pad msds,approved fire protection greensburg pa,stamp making k

It’s good to know that now that I’m more actively blogging once again at http://radgeek.com/ , the comment-form spammers are eager to come back and post new comment-form spam on all my writing. I wasn’t sure I remembered where I could get some custom stamps usps,approved stamp psd,stampin up paper pumpkin,amazon stamps usps,rubber stamp gift bags,trodat printy 4912 typo,stamp act protests,ebay stamp collections for sale,trodat stamp pad msds,approved fire protection greensburg pa,stamp making k

“Programming language designers have a saying: “Every new language is a response to the successes and shortcomings of other languages.” C# was specifically designed to be familiar to users of C, C++, and Java, while at the same time addressing the shortcomings of those languages. Looking back at my top 10 list, more than half of these annoyances are a direct result of including a feature primarily because it would be familiar to users of other languages. The overarching lesson is that long history and familiarity are not good enough reasons to include a dubious feature.” http://ift.tt/1NhKfPd (cross-posted: http://ift.tt/1NI1TZB)

“Programming language designers have a saying: “Every new language is a response to the successes and shortcomings of other languages.” C# was specifically designed to be familiar to users of C, C++, and Java, while at the same time addressing the shortcomings of those languages. Looking back at my top 10 list, more than half of these annoyances are a direct result of including a feature primarily because it would be familiar to users of other languages. The overarching lesson is that long history and familiarity are not good enough reasons to include a dubious feature.” http://ift.tt/1NhKfPd (cross-posted: http://ift.tt/1NI1TZB)