Kid Lib / was Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... As you please, but that doesn't affect the fact that their personal circumstances, as non-parents, aren't relevant to assessing the
Posts filed under Uncategorized
Re: Libertarian socialism / was Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, I don't think that Warren has a problem with money per se -- he has a problem with a particular sort of basis for money. (Hence the
Re: Freedom and partenting,was Antidiscriminationlaw
... Hash: SHA1 ... I agree with you about the importance of the conceptual distinction here. But I have to say that after having had more than a few friends go
Re: Freedom and partenting,was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... 1. Of course, nobody here is proposing that "libertarian philosophers" should decide whether or not someone is "too psychotic" to function.
Re: Freedom and partenting, was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... Look, I didn't say anything about what you did or did not say. I said something about what you asked, and what I answered. To quote, here's
Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... You're dodging the question. You earlier claimed that your "must," when it came to antidiscrimination law, was more than just a legal
Re: Unowned land/was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Amok Time
... Hash: SHA1 ... For reference, here's an example from Hoppe, in his utterly awful "Secession, the State, and the Immigration Problem"
Re: Freedom and partenting, was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... That's mighty white of you. I'm sure Rose Kennedy would have agreed with you. If she had still been capable of speech after her "treatment."
Re: Amok Time / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Freedom and partentin
... Hash: SHA1 ... So your answer is to roust them up, throw them into a locked hospital ward, and force psychotropic drugs on them until they agree with you
Re: Amok Time / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Freedom and partentin
... Hash: SHA1 ... No, I never said anything of the sort. What I said is that living on the street is not an aggressive act, and so is a poor example of
Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2025 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.