Ãœber-rationalist Yancey: Basically, his…

Ãœber-rationalist Yancey: Basically, his… (posted 1 February 2005, 9am / revised 5am 2 February 2006)

Über-rationalist Yancey:

Basically, his only criteria are that no submission may advocate voting, government, or the Constitution. Good standards, in my book.

Ahem. How, exactly, does someone advocate a trial for treason—a federal crime defined, in the U.S., in the Constitution—without advocating either government or the Constitution? What else would it be treason against?

Anticopyright. This was written 2005–2006 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.

Comments Elsewhere

Ãœber-rationalist Yancey: Basically, his… (posted 1 February 2005, 9am / revised 5am 2 February 2006)

Advertisement