February 15, 2014 at 02:59PM [via Facebook]
If you’re really, seriously worried that “I had eggs, toast and orange juice for breakfast” will somehow be misread as “I had the following for breakfast: (1) eggs, (2) toast and orange juice mixed together,” instead of “I had the following for breakfast: (1) eggs, (2) toast, and (3) orange juice,” then I have to say I don’t know why you’re stopping there. Why not worry about the fact that “I had eggs, toast, and orange juice for breakfast” might possibly be misread as: “I had the following for breakfast: juice made out of (1) eggs, (2) toast, and (3) oranges”? That’s just as justifiable a reading based on the syntax. But then the Oxford comma doesn’t fix that possible misreading. You might say, “But every competent reader of the language understands in context that ‘eggs’ is hardly ever intended to modify ‘juice’!” Of course they do. And every competent reader of the language also understands in context that you didn’t soak your toast in your orange juice, either. Even if you didn’t comma that point through their skull.