Ever get to the point where you’ve been fiddling on a page layout for so long just say, “To hell with it, I’m just going to publish this entire booklet in 14pt Papyrus”?

One problem with transcribing articles from Instead of a Magazine: Herman Kuehn’s devotion to “simplified” and “reformed” spelling schemes means that I more or less never know for sure when something is actually a typo, and when it is an intended variant.

is off to the post office to mail off some Market Anarchy; to-day, Anarchy comes to Wendell, NC; Orange, Cali.; Bronxville, NY; and Honolulu, Hawai’i.

is working with some pages of H.K.’s Instead of a Magazine (from 1915), which is quite possibly the ugliest publication in the entire Labadie Collection.

Well, I'm not sure what to say other than "Cool story, bro." Certainly if you thought that the panel was going to be about how everybody ought to have the right to stop making payments on their rented boats, then it seems to me that you may not know quite as much about free-market anticapitalist or mutualist positions as you think you knew. (*) In any case, my own view, which is what I'm going to be presenting for my end of things, is that there are quite a lot of things that you ought to be free to try to do in an anarchic market, and that if you want to try signing people up for conventional wage-labor employment contracts, or for any number of rental arrangements, you should feel free to try it. I have more or less no interest whatever in outlawing or nullifying just about any kind of mutually consensual contract. Try and sell people on whatever capitalistic crap you want, as far as I'm concerned. However, I also think there are a lot of reasons to suspect that you are going to have -- and that you *ought* to have -- a much harder time finding a market for your wares when people are no longer forced to carry the weight of a deeply broken financial system, and have the full range of peaceful alternatives available to them. For more on why, see maybe [Bits & Pieces](http://radgeek.com/gt/2010/05/05/bits-pieces-on-free-market-anti-capitalism-by-way-of-introduction-or-apology/) or [Scratching By](http://www.thefreemanonline.org/features/scratching-by-how-government-creates-poverty-as-we-know-it/), or the essays in [Markets Not Capitalism](http://radgeek.com/gt/2011/10/14/markets-not-capitalism-1st-ed/). Or just come by the panel and ask me about it. (* For reference, not all FMACs, and not all of the contributors to Markets Not Capitalism, are committed to a Tucker-style or Carson-style occupancy-and-use theory of land tenure. But those who are, as far as I can tell, still have more or less nothing at all to say about o&u that would touch on the status of boats, or other movable or immovable capital, because they are opposed to ground rents, not to house rents. Maybe you're not familiar with the distinction made here; and if not, that's fine, but if not, it's probably because you're not very familiar with mutualist ideas.)