Re: Historical fiction
... Certainly not. But there are forms of poetry which deliberately exclude themselves from representation as such. In any case, my claim was not about whether
Posts from August 2010
Archives:
Re: Historical fiction
... No, there are lots of ways of expressing how things are in China (:b) or in other parts of the world for that matter. But I do think (1) that to describe
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration (corrected link)
In LeftLibertarian2@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Katz ... Sure; that's what I see, too. ... I'm sorry if I was unclear; I didn't mean the bit about
Re: ‘anarchists’ for big gov’t??
... Well, from your reading, can you at least figure out what are *Tucker's* reasons for considering his system "socialistic" or a variety of socialism? For
Re: ‘anarchists’ for big gov’t??
... I'm aware that you've defined "libertarianism" and "socialism" in such a way as to make them mutually exclusive. My point is that recurring to those
Re: Historical fiction
... That sounds like a better description of what a certain kind of novel aims at than what literary art, just as such, aims at. There is plenty of literary
Re: Historical fiction
... Dan, I'm puzzled by your reply. I don't think I set up a "polarity" between facile works and *good* ones; I explicitly stated that there may be historical
Re: Evolution and religion
... 1. Not all "revealed religions" hold that God created human beings in His own image. 2. Those that do hold that, but that also accept the validity of
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration (corrected link)
... Do you have any direct evidence that Rockwell *regrets* writing that column (or the two similar columns he wrote for USA Today)? As far as I know, he has
Re: Lew Rockwell on immigration, civil liberties, police etc
... Uh. Did you read the article? All the way through? ... Which other videotaped Los Angeles-area police beating of an ex-con ca. 1991 did you think that Lew
Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2024 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.