Posts from January 2010
Archives:
Re: Another False Flag Operation Imminent?
Re: Let Liberty Ring
Re: brilliance
Re: Another False Flag Operation Imminent?
Re: Lew Rockwell and the Catholic Church
Re: Hoppe in One Lesson,Illustrated in Welfare Economics
The meaning of “capitalism” / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Laborta
Re: The Future’s Not What It Used To Be
Yeah. One of the notable subcategories of failed predictions, which, in the interest of brevity, I didn’t really discuss at much length, are the number of things which Kurzweil predicts which actually are now feasible or already implemented, and which have in some sense broken through — but as permanent niche products, which remain popular with a select class of people for a select few applications, and which pose no foreseeable threat of displacing anything or taking over the world like Kurzweil imagined they would. Reliable speech-to-text software is another example — you can pick up Dragon NaturallySpeaking for a couple hundred dollars and it’s good enough that a number of professional writers use it to do more or less all their writing. It’s just that all of them happen to have carpal tunnel syndrome or severe motor disabilities. Just about everyone else still uses a keyboard, even on devices like iPhones that don’t even have a physical keyboard (but do have a physical microphone, which could have been used for speech-recognition if anyone cared enough to insist on it).
It’s not that these technologies aren’t available, or even that they are priced out of most people’s reach; it’s just that people have the technology now but most of us don’t have much of a use for it as of yet. And there are, of course, drawbacks and trade-offs involved (you may love the idea of dictating your latest memo; but do you really want to hear all of your coworkers dictating theirs at the same time?), which futurists characteristically fail to take any account of.
Re: Muslims Find Christian Anti-Gay Laws Too Harsh
If the mic cut-out occurs during a discussion of malign spontaneous orders, one thing to keep in mind is that Roderick does have a pun associated with that discussion — “spontaneous ordure†— which may be the occasion for both the groaning and the apologies, rather than anyone getting upset over the content of the claim.