Re: Freedom and partenting, was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... Look, I didn't say anything about what you did or did not say. I said something about what you asked, and what I answered. To quote, here's
Posts from December 2009
Archives:
Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... You're dodging the question. You earlier claimed that your "must," when it came to antidiscrimination law, was more than just a legal
Re: Unowned land/was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Amok Time
... Hash: SHA1 ... For reference, here's an example from Hoppe, in his utterly awful "Secession, the State, and the Immigration Problem"
Re: Freedom and partenting, was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... That's mighty white of you. I'm sure Rose Kennedy would have agreed with you. If she had still been capable of speech after her "treatment."
Re: Amok Time / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Freedom and partentin
... Hash: SHA1 ... So your answer is to roust them up, throw them into a locked hospital ward, and force psychotropic drugs on them until they agree with you
Re: Amok Time / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Freedom and partentin
... Hash: SHA1 ... No, I never said anything of the sort. What I said is that living on the street is not an aggressive act, and so is a poor example of
Re: Paid in full/was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Libertarian socialism (b
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, right, but my point is just that I don't know what his source is for assigning that particular figure ("less" or "much less than one
Re: Libertarian socialism / was Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... Yes. In fact, they (especially Tucker) did so repeatedly and emphatically. But then, the whole point here just was that some early
Re: Paid in full
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, like I said, the answer here is "Yes" in one sense and "No" in another. He was perfectly willing to entertain the notion that
Re: Paid in full/was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Libertarian socialism (b
... Hash: SHA1 ... When Tucker wrote about "usury," the technical meaning he attached to it was charging for the mere "use of capital" (mutatis mutandis, money
Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2024 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.