Re: Is anyone capable of making a free choice?
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, I can't speak for anti-psychiatry libertarians generally. But for as resolute an anti-psychiatrist as Szasz, the argument certainly is
Posts from December 2009
Archives:
Re: Freedom and partenting
... Hash: SHA1 ... If you're interested in the philosophical question, then you'll need to start by clarifying what your question is. What do you mean when you
Re: Is anyone capable of making a free choice?
... Hash: SHA1 ... Do you have some evidence for this bald assertion? If so, what is it? My understanding is that damage to the frontal lobe is neither
Re: Amok Time / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Re: Freedom and partentin
... Hash: SHA1 ... Why would I call it that? It's not an accurate translation, since there are no consistent neurological correlates for either psychotic
Freed-market money / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Libertarian socialis
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well. It was rare to directly *prohibit* using money other than gold. But, then, you could in principle settle contracts today with all
Freed-market money / was Re: [LeftLibertarian2] Libertarian socialis
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, I think that we've had this discussion before, but my general position is that, in this particular debate, the money cranks and the
Kid Lib / was Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... As you please, but that doesn't affect the fact that their personal circumstances, as non-parents, aren't relevant to assessing the
Re: Libertarian socialism / was Re: Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... Well, I don't think that Warren has a problem with money per se -- he has a problem with a particular sort of basis for money. (Hence the
Re: Freedom and partenting,was Antidiscriminationlaw
... Hash: SHA1 ... I agree with you about the importance of the conceptual distinction here. But I have to say that after having had more than a few friends go
Re: Freedom and partenting,was Antidiscrimination law
... Hash: SHA1 ... 1. Of course, nobody here is proposing that "libertarian philosophers" should decide whether or not someone is "too psychotic" to function.
Anticopyright. All pages written 1996–2024 by Charles Johnson. Feel free to reprint if you like it. This machine kills intellectual monopolists.