Re: I-Team: Policy Group Takes on LVCVA
Vince Alberta says: “We generate a return on investment of about 10 times the amount.”
If the LVCVA’s activities have such a great ROI, then why should Las Vegas taxpayers be forced to fund their budget out of tax revenues? Good investments can find private investors, and if the casinos, in particular, benefit from LVCVA’s advertising, why not ask them to foot the bill for their own good investments?
If, on the other hand, the LVCVA’s activities are not actually beneficial enough that firms wouldn’t be willing to cover the costs on their own, then why should Las Vegas taxpayers be sent the bill for such a waste of money?
In either case, I can see no reason why we need a government-funded agency doing advertising for multibillion dollar private businesses.
Anticopyright.