Re: More of Ron Paul’s Infamous Newspaper Writings
The statements on race and homosexuality are perfectly vile and deserve condemnation, whoever wrote them. However, I’m a bit baffled by this:
Paul’s newsletters have themselves repeatedly expressed sympathy for the general concept of secession. In 1992, for instance, the Survival Report argued that “the right of secession should be ingrained in a free societyâ€
Well, shouldn’t it?
Most of the time, when we talk about a free society, part of what we are talking about is a society in which the powers of rulers derive from “the consent of the governed” rather than from unilateral command. But that would seem to mean that where consent has been refused or withdrawn, a right of secession must be recognized. Do you disagree?
and that “there is nothing wrong with loosely banding together small units of government. …”
Is there something wrong with this? If so, what?
Anticopyright.