Re: Tax Revolt in New Hampshire
Gavin,
I agree with you that nobody in the Federal government (or any other branch of government) has any right to extort taxes from Ed and Elaine Brown, or from anyone else who refuses to pay them. I agree that doing so is morally equivalent to slavery. I also agree with you that passing a law doesn’t make it one bit more just to engage in this form of robbery.
So my question is: why waste time on legalistic arguments like Russo’s and the Browns’ when you are arguing against the Feds’ right to demand taxes?
You seem to have just said that it wouldn’t matter to you whether or not the Feds ever passed a law requiring individuals to pay income tax. So why dwell on whether or not they did pass such a law? If they did, people have every right to ignore, evade, defy, and/or resist such a law–since it is nothing more than usurpation and highway robbery. If they didn’t pass a law, then the injustice of extracting taxes still doesn’t have anything to do with the fact that they didn’t pass it. After all, as I think we just agreed, even if they did pass such a law, it would still be unjust to treat people that way.
In either case, why not focus on what you seem to think is the real issue–i.e., the obvious injustice of tax laws, and the right of folks to ignore, defy, evade and resist unjust laws?