Kennedy: No such general…
No such general case exists. It’s perfectly legitimate to use force to keep anyone you like off of your own property, even if your reasons for for doing so are bigotted.
It’s not a crime to do so, but it is a vice. As it is a vice to do anything from collectivist (or, more specifically, bigotted) premises, actually.
But that wasn’t my point anyway, and if I was unclear, then my bad. Read “use violence against innocent third parties” where I wrote “use violence” above; criticizing someone for offering bigotted reasons to excuse aggression against innocent third parties is no more problematic than criticizing them for using any other form of collectivism (e.g. democratic mysticism, corruption of the blood, etc.) in order to excuse aggression against innocent third parties.
Anticopyright.